Pages

Liver and fat and guts – delicious!

Published: August 30, 2009

CHERENCE, FRANCE — Arrival is usually defined as reaching a destination, but of course it’s more than that, it’s the moment when you have shed enough of where you came from to be present at the place you’ve reached. This offloading of layers takes time, like peeling an onion.

My French arrival this year was time-consuming. Iran, which is another story, had me. But the moment came, and when it came, it was not the dawn swooping of starlings, the softness of the dusk light through the sycamores, or the chiming of a village bell that delivered me to “la douce France,” but the sight of glistening guts.

The guts in question were being coaxed by a hand — ungloved — from the belly of a four-pound sea bass — unfarmed — at the market in the Norman town of Vernon, which has one stand devoted solely to watercress. The fish, iridescent, its gills bright scarlet, was fresh from the waters off Dieppe.

My friend Marcel Bossy, who had made the pre-dawn drive from the coast with his glossy load, had his hand deep in the fish. He was laughing about something as the guts slithered onto a scale-coated chopping board.

My 11-year-old daughter, Adele, covered her eyes, but I was riveted. Marcel’s wife, Sandrine, also laughing — something ribald between them — was gutting firm mackerel with swift incisions and finger movements, when one dropped to the ground. She scooped the fish up and resumed work on it, putting me in mind of Julia Child’s famous statement about a miss-flipped potato pancake: “You can always pick it up.”

Since Child, in “Mastering the Art of French Cooking,” and in her groundbreaking 1960’s television show “The French Chef,” brought Gallic secrets to riveted Americans, the shameless gutting and picking-up of real food in ungloved hands has given way to the hurried-hermetic-hygienic U.S. fever of plastic gloves, processed foods and precooked meals.

Those fish guts delivered me to France because, although this country has its share of fast-food outlets, it has preserved a relationship to food distinguished from the American in three essential respects: fear, time and “terroir.”

If Americans want their fish pre-filleted, their chicken breasts excised from surrounding bone and conveniently packed, their offal kept from view and the table, and any hand that touches a slice of ham or lox sealed inside a glove, it is because fear of the innards that will not speak their name, the guts that reek of life, and the germs we all carry has become rampant.

By contrast, the French don’t believe what they’re eating is genuine unless they’ve seen gritty proof of provenance. They like the alchemy of the peasant hand that does the pâté grip.

American anxiety is related to the American perception of time, which is always short in a land that prizes efficiency above all. Precooked meals — food divorced from its origins, food without guts — is faster to prepare and therefore attractive.

I bought a couple of the female ducklings the French call “canettes” the other day. It took 15 minutes for the cutting-off of head, feet and wing-tips; for the innards to be removed; for the placing in the cleansed insides of the liver, kidneys and neck; for singeing over a gas burner; and for discussion as to whether I wanted the plump ducks trussed for rotisserie cooking (I did not.)

Most stores in New York don’t bother selling ducklings — they’re inefficient birds in that the meat-to-size ratio is low — and if they did such protracted preparation would be unthinkable. Time bows at the altar of gastronomy in France. In the United States time is the altar.

The third fundamental difference relates to “terroir,” the untranslatable combination of soil, hearth and tradition that links most French people to a particular place. France sees American mobility with a sacred immobility; attachments trump restlessness.

These are attachments of the gut, which brings us back to why the French take such pleasure in those hands at work cleansing a sea bass or a duckling, and why a stand selling watercress (with the unique taste of a particular patch of soil) is viable.

The French Paradox, so-called, is really the French self-evidence. Change your relationship to fear, time and place, and you change your metabolism. This has less to do with the specific foods eaten, or the specific wine drunk (although of course they count) than it has to do with how food is approached.

According to the 2009 C.I.A. World Factbook, the estimated average life expectancy in France is 80.98 (84.33 for women and 77.79 for men), against 78.11 for the United States (80.69 for women and 75.65 for men.) France ranks 9th in the world; America ranks 50th. There’s something to be said for ungloved hands picking mackerel from the ground.

The American healthcare debate is skewed. It should be devoting more time to changing U.S. culinary and eating habits in ways that cut the need for expensive care by reducing rampant obesity, to which anxiety, haste and disconnectedness contribute. France has much to teach, guts and all.

3 comments to Liver and fat and guts – delicious!

  • Meta

    *drools*

    I’m so jealous! In the 3 years that I’ve been back in Adelaide, I have NEVER had a decent pate EVER! Maggie Beer?? Pah! My desk eraser tastes better than that siht!

  • Andrew M

    Because it is so inhumane, the production of foie gras has been banned in 13 EU countries. It is also illegal to produce it in Australia, Israel, Turkey and Argentina (yes, meat-loving Argentina!). In the United States, the State of California has banned both the production and the distribution of foie gras from 2012 onwards.

    The French, however, love the stuff. France produces and consumes around 80% of worldwide foie gras production and in 2006 legislation was enacted that enshrines foie gras as part of the “protected cultural and gastronomical heritage of France.”
    http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnArticleDeCode?commun=&code=CRURALNL.rcv&art=L654-27-1

    It would be interesting to compare the production methods used by Fred’s dad with those at the
    American farm discussed in the following article:
    http://www.villagevoice.com/2009-02-18/news/is-foie-gras-torture/

  • I agree, I’ve always had a love/hate relationship with foie gras. Its delicious. Its really bad for your health. There are some horrible facts about how its produced. Some people say that it all depends on the producer and that it doesnt have to be inhumane. So I guess thats why I really want to go and see the process from beginning to end. If I’m going to be eating Fred’s dad’s foie gras and duck confit on a regular basis then I want to be sure I’m not encouraging/validating animal cruelty.

    For every farm that is cruel to the birds, there will be another that takes their welfare seriously (like the article you attached). And as I was saying to Adam today, its actually the same issue with eggs, and chickens, and I guess all meat generally.

    Jamie Oliver did a special on super-cheap chickens in UK supermarkets and found that they were so cheap because they were raised cheaply – and inhumanely. He met one farmer who was trying to improve the living conditions of a portion of his chickens, but said that he just couldnt sell enough of them at the price he needed to recoup his costs, and needed to continue with a portion being raised in cages. What price do we put on the health and welfare of living beings? I understand that some families would really struggle to pay more for their meat. My answer to that is that they should switch to a more vegetarian diet and have meat as a special treat. They wouldnt treat their pet dogs and cats like the chickens they eat.

    In France, I’ve noticed that egg labelling is much clearer than Australia. If they’re raised in cages, it says so on the box. And in the butchers here, you can definitely see the health and quality of the birds because everything is still intact. But what about those nice pink chicken fillets on a styrofoam tray with no labelling at all about their origins?

    In a way, I kinda like the Australian trend towards branding their meat products, like “Bangalow Pork”, “King Island Wagyu”, “Saltbush Lamb”, “Barossa Chicken”. Ok, a lot of it is for snobbery value, both by the restaurants that buy the meat and the clients who like to brag about what they ate. Whatever. Its improving the living conditions of the animals, and people are happy to pay a bit extra.

    I think Adam and I agreed at the end of our conversation today: what we need is better advertising of where our food comes from and how its handled, so that we can make our own, informed choices. Or a personal visit to see with one’s own eyes.. :-)

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>